26
results
  • opmv - Open Provenance Model Vocabulary
    http://purl.org/net/opmv/ns#
    OPMV, the Open Provenance Model Vocabulary, provides terms to enable practitioners of data publishing to publish their data responsibly. @en
  • prvt - Provenance Vocabulary types
    http://purl.org/net/provenance/types#
    Extends the Provenance Vocabulary by defining subclasses of the types of provenance elements introduced in the core ontology. @en
  • voag - Vocabulary Of Attribution and Governance
    http://voag.linkedmodel.org/schema/voag
    VOAG is intended to specify licensing, attribution, provenance and governance of an ontology. @en
  • airo - AI Risk Ontology
    https://w3id.org/airo
    AIRO represents AI risk concepts and relations based on the AI Act draft and ISO 31000 standard series. @en
  • pmlp - PML2 provenance ontology
    http://inference-web.org/2.0/pml-provenance.owl
    The provenance part of PML2 ontology. It is a fundamental component of PML2 ontology. @en
  • dqc - The Data Quality Constraints Library
    http://semwebquality.org/ontologies/dq-constraints
    This RDF document contains a library of data quality constraints represented as SPARQL query templates based on the SPARQL Inferencing Framework (SPIN). The data quality constraint templates are especially useful for the identification of data quality problems during data entry and for periodic quality checks during data usage. @en
  • dqv - Data Quality Vocabulary
    http://www.w3.org/ns/dqv
    The Data Quality Vocabulary (DQV) is seen as an extension to DCAT to cover the quality of the data, how frequently is it updated, whether it accepts user corrections, persistence commitments etc. When used by publishers, this vocabulary will foster trust in the data amongst developers. @en
  • cert - The Cert Ontology
    http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/cert#
    Ontology for Certificates and crypto stuff. @en
  • sh - W3C Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Vocabulary
    http://www.w3.org/ns/shacl#
    This vocabulary defines terms used in SHACL, the W3C Shapes Constraint Language. @en
  • opmo - Open Provenance Model
    http://openprovenance.org/model/opmo
    The Open Provenance Model is a model of provenance that is designed to meet the following requirements: (1) To allow provenance information to be exchanged between systems, by means of a compatibility layer based on a shared provenance model. (2) To allow developers to build and share tools that operate on such a provenance model. (3) To define provenance in a precise, technology-agnostic manner. (4) To support a digital representation of provenance for any 'thing', whether produced by computer systems or not. (5) To allow multiple levels of description to coexist. (6) To define a core set of rules that identify the valid inferences that can be made on provenance representation. @en
  • acrt - Agent Certification Ontology
    http://privatealpha.com/ontology/certification/1#
    This document specifies a vocabulary for asserting the existence of official endorsements or certifications of agents, such as people and organizations. @en
  • cs - Changeset
    http://purl.org/vocab/changeset/schema
    This vocabulary defines a set of terms for describing changes to resource descriptions. @en
  • bbcprov - BBC Provenance Ontology
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/ontologies/provenance
    The provenance ontology supports data management and auditing tasks. It is used to define the different types of named graphs we used in the store (quad store) and enables their association with metadata that allow us to manage, validate and expose data to BBC services @en
  • test - Test Metadata
    http://www.w3.org/2006/03/test-description
    This ontology aims at defining the Quality Assurance Framework by collecting the test development experience of W3C Working Groups and summarizing the work done about tests and metadata. @en
  • earl - Evaluation and Report Language
    http://www.w3.org/ns/earl
    EARL is a vocabulary, the terms of which are defined across a set of specifications and technical notes, and that is used to describe test results. The primary motivation for developing this vocabulary is to facilitate the exchange of test results between Web accessibility evaluation tools in a vendor-neutral and platform-independent format. It also provides reusable terms for generic quality assurance and validation purposes. @en