148
results
-
This ontology extends the SAREF ontology for the water domain. This work has been developed in the context of the STF 566, which was established with the goal to create three SAREF extensions, one of them for the water domain. @en
-
GConsent provides concepts and relationships for defining consent and its associated information or metadata with a view towards GDPR compliance. It is the outcome of an analysis of consent and requirements associated with obtaining, using, and changes in consent as per the GDPR. The ontology also provides an approach to using its terms in various scenarios and use-cases (see more information in the documentation) which is intended to assist in its adoption. @en
-
GDPRov is an OWL2 ontology to express provenance metadata of consent and data lifecycles towards documenting compliance for GDPR. @en
-
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is comprised of several articles, each with points that refer to specific concepts. The general convention of referring to these points and concepts is to quote the specific article or point using a human-readable reference. This ontology provides a way to refer to the points within the GDPR using the EurLex ontology published by the European Publication Office. It also defines the concepts defined, mentioned, and requried by the GDPR using the Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) ontology. @en
-
The Internet of Things taxonomy is extended with semantic ontologies for IoT layers, containing classes, properties, individuals, and rules specific to IoT technologies, tools, and applications @en
-
OntoGSN is an ontology for managing assurance cases in the Goal Structuring Notation (GSN). The goal of the ontology is to help users in linking the elements of their cases - claims and evidence - with the internationalized resource identifiers (IRIs) of represented concepts, events and data, and in evaluating the validity of their argument. @en
-
A vocabulary to represent relations that should be more transparent, usually between powerfull people or institutions @en
-
A vocabulary of particles used for observations in astronomy. This list started its existence as the controlled vocabulary for VODataService's vs:Waveband type; the machine-readable identifiers are in upper case for backwards compatibility. @en
-
A vocabulary to describe a person's profile and history @en
-
MOAC, the Management of a Crisis Vocabulary, is a lightweight vocabulary aiming to provide terms to enable practitioners to relate different "things" in crisis management activities together as Linked Data. The initial MOAC terms originated from the Inter Agency Standing Committee (IASC), Emergency Shelter Cluster in Haiti, UNOCHA 3W Who What Where Contact Database @en
-
The Data Knowledge Vocabulary allows for a comprehensive description of data assets and enterprise data management. It covers a business data dictionary, data quality management, data governance, the technical infrastructure and many other aspects of enterprise data management. The vocabulary represents a linked data implementation of the Data Knowledge Model which resulted from extensive applied research. @en
-
A Knowledge Model to describe a smart city, that interconnect data from infomobility service, Open Data and other source @en
-
An Ontology for Consumer Electronics Products and Services @en
-
The Building Concrete Monitoring Ontology (BCOM) is defined for capturing information of concrete work, concrete curing and testing of concrete properties. Further Information on the development and usage of the Ontology can be found in the following publication: Liu et al. (2021): An ontology integrating as-built information for infrastructure asset management using BIM and semantic web. In: Proceedings of 2021 European Conference on Computing in Construction, Online eConference, URL: https://ec-3.org/publications/conferences/2021/paper/?id=167 @en
-
The Building Topology Ontology (BOT) is a simple ontology defining the core concepts of a building. It is a simple, easy to extend ontology for the construction industry to document and exchange building data on the web. Changes since version 0.2.0 of the ontology are documented in: https://w3id.org/bot/bot.html#changes The version 0.2.0 of the ontology is documented in: Mads Holten Rasmussen, Pieter Pauwels, Maxime Lefrançois, Georg Ferdinand Schneider, Christian Anker Hviid and Jan Karlshøj (2017) Recent changes in the Building Topology Ontology, 5th Linked Data in Architecture and Construction Workshop (LDAC2017), November 13-15, 2017, Dijon, France, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320631574_Recent_changes_in_the_Building_Topology_Ontology The initial version 0.1.0 of the ontology was documented in: Mads Holten Rasmussen, Pieter Pauwels, Christian Anker Hviid and Jan Karlshøj (2017) Proposing a Central AEC Ontology That Allows for Domain Specific Extensions, Lean and Computing in Construction Congress (LC3): Volume I – Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Computing in Construction (JC3), July 4-7, 2017, Heraklion, Greece, pp. 237-244 https://doi.org/10.24928/JC3-2017/0153 @en