128
results
-
Ontology for Certificates and crypto stuff. @en
-
The Data Quality Vocabulary (DQV) is seen as an extension to DCAT to cover the quality of the data, how frequently is it updated, whether it accepts user corrections, persistence commitments etc. When used by publishers, this vocabulary will foster trust in the data amongst developers. @en
-
EARL is a vocabulary, the terms of which are defined across a set of specifications and technical notes, and that is used to describe test results. The primary motivation for developing this vocabulary is to facilitate the exchange of test results between Web accessibility evaluation tools in a vendor-neutral and platform-independent format. It also provides reusable terms for generic quality assurance and validation purposes. @en
-
The ISA Programme Location Core Vocabulary provides a minimum set of classes and properties for describing any place in terms of its name, address or geometry. The vocabulary is specifically designed to aid the publication of data that is interoperable with EU INSPIRE Directive. @en
-
The Open Annotation Core Data Model specifies an interoperable framework for creating associations between related resources, annotations, using a methodology that conforms to the Architecture of the World Wide Web. This ontology is a non-normative OWL formalization of the textual OA specification at http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/20130208/index.html @en
-
This vocabulary defines terms used in SHACL, the W3C Shapes Constraint Language. @en
-
This ontology is based on the SSN Ontology by the W3C Semantic Sensor Networks Incubator Group (SSN-XG), together with considerations from the W3C/OGC Spatial Data on the Web Working Group. @en
-
Web Of Trust (wot) RDF vocabulary, described using W3C RDF Schema and the Web Ontology Language. @en
-
The ontology is aimed at the support of research groups in the field of Business Modeling and Knowledge Engineering (BMaKE) in their collaborative work for qualitatively analyzing scholarly papers as well as sharing the results of that analyses and judgements. @en
-
Defines temporal / spatial concepts and general-purpose datastructures @en
-
This is the extension of SAREF for the EEBus and Energy@Home project. The documentation of SAREF4EE is available at http://ontology.tno.nl/SAREF4EE_Documentation_v0.1.pdf. SAREF4EE represents 1) The configuration information exchanged in the use case 'Remote Network Management' according to the EEBus Technical Report, Protocol Specification- Remote Network Management, version 1.0.0.2, 2015-09-19; 2) The scheduling information about power sequences exchanged in the use cases Appliance scheduling through CEM and remote start' and 'Automatic cycle rescheduling', according to the message structures described in General Message Structures, version 0.1.1, 2015-10-07; 3) The monitor and control information exchanged in the use case 'Communicate appliance status and info on manually planned cycles', according to the monitoring and control part of the Energy@Home Data Model, version 1.0; and 4) the event-based data exchanged in the use case 'Demand Response', according to General Message Structures, version 0.1.1, 2015-10-07. @en
-
This ontology extends the SAREF ontology for the environment domain, specifically for the light pollution domain, including concepts like photometers, light, etc. @en
-
This ontology extends the SAREF ontology for the water domain. This work has been developed in the context of the STF 566, which was established with the goal to create three SAREF extensions, one of them for the water domain. @en
-
GDPRov is an OWL2 ontology to express provenance metadata of consent and data lifecycles towards documenting compliance for GDPR. @en
-
The notion of territory plays a major role in human and social sciences. In an historical context, most approaches are irrelevant as they rely on geometric data, which is not available. In order to represent historical territories,we conceived the HHT ontology (Hierarchical Historical Territory) to represent hierarchical historical territorial divisions, without having to know their geometry. This approach relies on a notion of building blocks to replace polygonal geometry @en