116
results
  • GConsent provides concepts and relationships for defining consent and its associated information or metadata with a view towards GDPR compliance. It is the outcome of an analysis of consent and requirements associated with obtaining, using, and changes in consent as per the GDPR. The ontology also provides an approach to using its terms in various scenarios and use-cases (see more information in the documentation) which is intended to assist in its adoption. @en
  • GDPRov is an OWL2 ontology to express provenance metadata of consent and data lifecycles towards documenting compliance for GDPR. @en
  • The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is comprised of several articles, each with points that refer to specific concepts. The general convention of referring to these points and concepts is to quote the specific article or point using a human-readable reference. This ontology provides a way to refer to the points within the GDPR using the EurLex ontology published by the European Publication Office. It also defines the concepts defined, mentioned, and requried by the GDPR using the Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) ontology. @en
  • Ontology for the orchestration of the aerOS continuum. @en
  • AIRO represents AI risk concepts and relations based on the AI Act draft and ISO 31000 standard series. @en
  • The Context Description module includes models for the context of a cultural property, in a broad sense: agents (e.g.: author, collector, copyright holder), objects (e.g.: inventories, bibliography, protective measures, other cultural properties, collections etc.), activities (e.g.: surveys, conservation interventions), situations (e.g.: commission, coin issuance, estimate, legal situation) related, involved or involving the cultural property. Thus it represents attributes that do not result from a measurement of features in a cultural property, but are associated with it. @en
  • The Core module represents general-purpose concepts orthogonal to the whole network, which are imported by all other ontology modules (e.g. part-whole relation, classification). @en
  • The Denotative Description module encodes the characteristics of a cultural property, as detectable and/or detected during the cataloguing process and measurable according to a reference system. Examples include measurements e.g. length, constituting materials e.g. clay, employed techniques e.g. melting, conservation status e.g. good, decent, bad. In this module are used as template the following Ontology Design Patterns: - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/collectionentity.owl - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/classification.owl - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/descriptionandsituation.owl - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/situation.owl @en
  • The Ontology of units of Measure (OM) 2.0 models concepts and relations important to scientific research. It has a strong focus on units, quantities, measurements, and dimensions. @en
  • A Knowledge Model to describe a smart city, that interconnect data from infomobility service, Open Data and other source @en
  • This ontology is a specialization of the lifecycle vocabulary (http://purl.org/vocab/lifecycle/schema) meant to be used in the context of IoT. It is used as a module in the IoT core domain ontology IoT-O (www.irit.fr/recherches/MELODI/ontologies/IoT-O). IoT-Lifecycle adds a specific state definition (ParametrizedState) and a specific transition (Update) that is useful to model actuators. @en
  • Simple ontology for Cloud Computing Services. This ontology allows to define model of prices used in large cloud computing providers such as Google, Amazon, Azure, etc., including options for regions, type of instances, prices specification, etc. @en
  • The DINGO ontology (Data Integration for Grant Ontology) defines the terms of the DINGO vocabulary and provides a machine readable extensible framework to model data relative to projects, funding, project and funding actors, and, notably, funding policies. It is designed to yield high modeling power and elasticity to cope with the huge variety in funding and project practices, which makes it applicable to many areas where funding is an important aspect: first of all research, but also the arts, cultural conservation, and many others. @en
  • The scope of the DIO is the domain of design intent or design rationale that needs to be documented while undertaking the design of any artifact @en