110
results
-
The Construction Tasks Ontology (CTO) describes tasks operating on construction elements, spatial zones and/or damages. The tasks are either planned or executed depending on the dataset metadata context of the dataset its used in. Five different types of tasks are defined: instalment, removal, modification, repair and inspection. Consequences of tasks on the dataset, i.e. added and/or deleted triples, are modeled using reified statements. The tasks can link to a reified statement using the CTO relations. @en
-
An ontology for describing changes between OWL ontology versions @en
-
Ontology that defines the topology of damages in constructions. @en
-
This ontology is a composition of some content design patterns for the semiotic triangle. Its structure is extracted from DOLCE-Ultralite (DOLCE+c.DnS), but it uses a different terminology, @en
-
An ontology for aligning existing linguistic ontologies, and for describing the research objects of NLP. @en
-
An ontology that describes the management of the traffic in a straight road with two lanes, both in the same direction. @en
-
SAREF4INMA is an extension of SAREF for the industry and manufacturing domain. SAREF4INMA focuses on extending SAREF for the industry and manufacturing domain to solve the lack of interoperability between various types of production equipment that produce items in a factory and, once outside the factory, between different organizations in the value chain to uniquely track back the produced items to the corresponding production equipment, batches, material and precise time in which they were manufactured. SAREF4INMA is specified and published by ETSI in the TS 103 410-5 associated to this ontology file. SAREF4INMA was created to be aligned with related initiatives in the smart industry and manufacturing domain in terms of modelling and standardization, such as the Reference Architecture Model for Industry 4.0 (RAMI), which combines several standards used by the various national initiatives in Europe that support digitalization in manufacturing. The full list of use cases, standards and requirements that guided the creation of SAREF4INMA are described in the associated ETSI TR 103 507. @en
-
Ontology for Cloud Computing Instances. Instance are classes of VM that comprise varying combinations of CPU, memory, storage, and networking capacity. This ontology allows to define the instantiation model of MVs used in large cloud computing providers such as Amazon, Azure, etc. @en
-
Simple and direct pricing ontology for Cloud Computing Services. This ontology allows to define model of prices used in large cloud computing providers such as Amazon, Azure, etc., including options for regions, type of instances, prices specification, etc. @en
-
Ontology for the definition of regions and zones of availability on CloudComputing platforms and services. This ontology allows to define model of regions used in large cloud computing providers such as Amazon, Azure, etc. @en
-
The euBusinessGraph (`ebg:`) ontology represents companies, type/status/economic classification, addresses, identifiers, company officers (e.g., directors and CEOs), and dataset offerings. It uses `schema:domainIncludes/rangeIncludes` (which are polymorphic) to describe which properties are applicable to a class, rather than `rdfs:domain/range` (which are monomorphic) to prescribe what classes must be applied to each node using a property. We find that this enables more flexible reuse and combination of different ontologies. We reuse the following ontologies and nomenclatures, and extend them where appropriate with classes and properties: - W3C Org, W3C RegOrg (basic company data), - W3C Time (officer membership), - W3C Locn (addresses), - schema.org (domain/rangeIncludes and various properties) - DBpedia ontology (jurisdiction) - NGEO and Spatial (NUTS administrative divisions) - ADMS (identifiers), - FOAF, SIOC (blog posts), - RAMON, SKOS (NACE economic classifications and various nomenclatures), - VOID (dataset descriptions). This is only a reference. See more detail in the [EBG Semantic Model](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dhMOTlIOC6dOK_jksJRX0CB-GIRoiYY6fWtCnZArUhU/edit) google document, which includes an informative description of classes and properties, gives examples and data provider rules, and provides more schema and instance diagrams. @en
-
This ontology defines concepts related to federation of internet infrastructures. @en
-
The NLP Interchange Format (NIF) is an RDF/OWL-based format that aims to achieve interoperability between Natural Language Processing (NLP) tools, language resources and annotations. @en
-
Ontology for Open Fridge project @en
-
This ontology is a reduced-in-scope version of the [W3C Decisions and Decision-Making Incubator Group](https://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/decision/)'s Decision Ontology (DO) which can be found at <https://github.com/nicholascar/decision-o>. It has been re-worked to align entirely with the W3C's [PROV ontology](https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/) since it is widely recognised that analysing the elements of decisions *post hoc* is an exercise in provenance. Unlike the original DO, this ontology cannot be used for *normative* scenarios: it is only capable of recording decisions that have already been made (so-called *data-driven* use in the DO). This is because PROV, to which this ontology is completely mapped, does not have a templating system which can indicate what *should* occur in future scenarios. This ontology introduces only one new element for decision modelling over that which was present in the DO: an Agent which allows agency in decision making to be recorded. @en