167
results
  • The Internet of Things taxonomy is extended with semantic ontologies for IoT layers, containing classes, properties, individuals, and rules specific to IoT technologies, tools, and applications @en
  • OntoGSN is an ontology for managing assurance cases in the Goal Structuring Notation (GSN). The goal of the ontology is to help users in linking the elements of their cases - claims and evidence - with the internationalized resource identifiers (IRIs) of represented concepts, events and data, and in evaluating the validity of their argument. @en
  • Ontology that defines the conceptual model for the Pilot 5 - Smart Building use case @en
  • The module Location models information related to the localization and georeferencing of a cultural property. In this module are used as template the following Ontology Design Patterns: - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/collectionentity.owl - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/classification.owl - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/place.owl - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/timeindexedsituation.owl - http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/situation.owl @en
  • This ontology is intended to describe Semantic Actuator Networks, as a counterpoint to SSN definition of Semantic Sensor Networks. An actuator is a physical device having an effect on the world (see Actuator for more information). It is worth noticing that some concepts are imported from SSN, but not SSN as a whole. This is a design choice intended to separate as much as possible the definition on actuator from the definition of sensor, which are completely different concept that can be used independantly from each other. This ontology is used as a ontological module in IoT-O ontology. @en
  • A vocabulary of particles used for observations in astronomy. This list started its existence as the controlled vocabulary for VODataService's vs:Waveband type; the machine-readable identifiers are in upper case for backwards compatibility. @en
  • This ontology contains geographic feature classes and associated properties including classes and properties for describing the spatial location of the geographic feature. The classes and properties have been defined based on an ESRI dataset. @en
  • The Ontology of units of Measure (OM) 2.0 models concepts and relations important to scientific research. It has a strong focus on units, quantities, measurements, and dimensions. @en
  • Arpenteur ontology is dedicated to photogrammetry, archeology and oceanology communities in order to perform tasks such as image processing, photogrammetry and modelling. @en
  • Basic properties of a country as defined by ISO 3166 (code and name) @en
  • The Data Knowledge Vocabulary allows for a comprehensive description of data assets and enterprise data management. It covers a business data dictionary, data quality management, data governance, the technical infrastructure and many other aspects of enterprise data management. The vocabulary represents a linked data implementation of the Data Knowledge Model which resulted from extensive applied research. @en
  • An Ontology for Consumer Electronics Products and Services @en
  • The Geonames ontology provides elements of description for geographical features defined in the geonames.org data base @en
  • The Building Concrete Monitoring Ontology (BCOM) is defined for capturing information of concrete work, concrete curing and testing of concrete properties. Further Information on the development and usage of the Ontology can be found in the following publication: Liu et al. (2021): An ontology integrating as-built information for infrastructure asset management using BIM and semantic web. In: Proceedings of 2021 European Conference on Computing in Construction, Online eConference, URL: https://ec-3.org/publications/conferences/2021/paper/?id=167 @en
  • The Building Topology Ontology (BOT) is a simple ontology defining the core concepts of a building. It is a simple, easy to extend ontology for the construction industry to document and exchange building data on the web. Changes since version 0.2.0 of the ontology are documented in: https://w3id.org/bot/bot.html#changes The version 0.2.0 of the ontology is documented in: Mads Holten Rasmussen, Pieter Pauwels, Maxime Lefrançois, Georg Ferdinand Schneider, Christian Anker Hviid and Jan Karlshøj (2017) Recent changes in the Building Topology Ontology, 5th Linked Data in Architecture and Construction Workshop (LDAC2017), November 13-15, 2017, Dijon, France, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320631574_Recent_changes_in_the_Building_Topology_Ontology The initial version 0.1.0 of the ontology was documented in: Mads Holten Rasmussen, Pieter Pauwels, Christian Anker Hviid and Jan Karlshøj (2017) Proposing a Central AEC Ontology That Allows for Domain Specific Extensions, Lean and Computing in Construction Congress (LC3): Volume I – Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Computing in Construction (JC3), July 4-7, 2017, Heraklion, Greece, pp. 237-244 https://doi.org/10.24928/JC3-2017/0153 @en